Sorry for this. Wrong email list.
On 4/5/2021 5:31 PM, Gunther Schadow wrote:
Hi,
I wonder can we set up a hot standby i
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe
Hi,
I wonder can we set up a hot standby in such a way that we don't need
any log streaming nor shipping, where instead every hot standby just
mounts the same disk in read-only mode which the master uses to write
his WAL files?
Even without a clustered file system, e.g., a UFS on FreeBSD, on
On 2/10/2021 11:47 AM, Sean Chittenden wrote:
Expect to see something about this on this year's Community Survey and the
Core Team will do something with this information.
Cloud has been an increasingly important workload for FreeBSD users.
Thank you Sean,
I think it would really be good to
I think we got enough feed back now from other professionals to suggest that it
would do the FreeBSD project good to acknowledge the issue and create some sort
of work in progress / project statement, perhaps a wiki, where people can flock
to to look for workarounds, current statue, just to not fe
Hi Sean and Brendan
On 2/5/2021 6:14 PM, Sean Chittenden wrote:
To be clear, this is a known issue that needs attention: it is not a
benchmarking setup problem. Network throughput has a similar problem and
needs similar attention. Cloud is not a fringe server workload. -sc
I am so glad you
Gordon Bergling wrote:
Can you verify your feelings by numbers?
Yes, like I said
Not by a few % points, but by factors if not an order of magnitude!
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253261
Do this:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nvd2 bs=100M status=progress
and you see that it'
Hi, I've been with FreeBSD since 386BSD 0.0new. Always tried to run
everything on it. I saw us lose the epic race against Linux over the
stupid BSDI lawsuit. But now I'm afraid I am witnessing the complete
fading of FreeBSD from relevance in the marketplace as the performance
of FreeBSD on AWS EC2
