So, is ULE ready for production on 6.0-RELEASE?
Can we use it without fear?
Cheers
Gea-Suan Lin wrote:
Hi,
In http://blog.gslin.org/archives/2005/12/12/252/ we test more cases,
and summary some important conclusions:
* SCHED_ULE (kernel options) is faster than SCHED_4BSD.
* Use kern.timecoun
Yes. thanks for correction Jeremie ;)
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi, Gustavo,
In my first post in this thread, there are some numbers for connections
from localhost, but using TCP instead of socket.
For the sake of accuracy, sockets are either TCP or Unix (and maybe
other kinds). Thus you mean
Since the last post just had freebsd numbers, I'm re-posting it including
Linux as well. Both linux and freebsd numbers were taken from the same box:
LINUX
# uname -a
Linux xoxoxoxox.com 2.6.14-1.1644_FC4smp #1 SMP Sun Nov 27 03:39:31 EST 2005
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Fedora core 4 - my
Since the last post just had freebsd numbers, I'm re-posting it including
Linux as well. Both linux and freebsd numbers were taken from the same box:
LINUX
# uname -a
Linux xoxoxoxox.com 2.6.14-1.1644_FC4smp #1 SMP Sun Nov 27 03:39:31 EST 2005
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Fedora core 4 - mysql
Localhost using unix socket.
In my first post in this thread, there are some numbers for connections from
localhost, but using TCP instead of socket.
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gustavo A. Baratto" <[EMAIL PR
2 0 0 14416.07
Wed Nov 30 22:47:33 EST 2005
---
For linuxthreads and libpthread, the numbers are all within the same margin
as the other post as well.
Cheers
- Original Message -
From: "Xin LI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gustav
