В Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:02:03 +0100
"O. Hartmann" пишет:
> Just read this on
>
> phoronix.com
>
> Is this finally a chance to get GPGPU on FreeBSD natively supported?
>
> nVidia has a binary driver, supporting well their higher end graphics
> cards on FreeBSD 64bit natively.
>
> I do not unders
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:38:16 +0200
Alexander Motin пишет:
> On 03/12/12 22:22, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
> > Alexander Motin пишет:
> >
> >> On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> >>> В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
Alexander Motin пишет:
> On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
> > Alexander Motin пишет:
> >
> >> On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> >>> В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200
Alexander Motin пишет:
> On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
> > Alexander Motin пишет:
> >
> >> On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> >>> В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200
Alexander Motin пишет:
> On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
> > Alexander Motin пишет:
> >> I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD
> >> opened simple a
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200
Alexander Motin пишет:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD
> opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've
> found that at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and
> SandyBridge Core i7s) wi
В Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:02:44 +0100
Attilio Rao пишет:
> 2011/12/15 Jeremy Chadwick :
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >> 2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick :
> >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> >> > Not fully right, boinc defaults to r
В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:35 +0400
Andrey Chernov пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >
> > >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the
> > >> problem has Core2Duo, or in a piece of cod
В Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:01:56 -0800
m...@freebsd.org пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:04:42 +0100
> > Jilles Tjoelker пишет:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:48AM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> >>
В Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:02:15 +
Marcus Reid пишет:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:29:14PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE
> > > performs much better than SCHED_4BSD?
> >
> > I complained about
В Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:04:42 +0100
Jilles Tjoelker пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:48AM +0200, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the
> > problem has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE
> > scheduler.
> On 12/12/2011 05:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs
> > much better than SCHED_4BSD?
>
> I complained about poor interactive performance of ULE in a desktop
> environment for years. I had numerous people try to help, including
> Jeff,
В Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:18:35 +
Bruce Cran пишет:
> On 12/12/2011 15:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > This comes up every 9 months or so, and must be approaching FAQ
> > status. In a HPC environment, I recommend 4BSD. Depending on the
> > workload, ULE can cause a severe increase in turn around tim
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:11:42 +0200
"Hartmann, O." пишет:
> It would be great to see this in 10.0-CURRENT, even if it is marked
> "highly experimental".
My patch for CURRENT http://pazzle.otdux.com.ua/fbfs_12_8_2011.my.patch
___
freebsd-performance@freeb
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:30:22 +0100
Vincent Hoffman пишет:
> On 18/10/2011 16:24, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:02:47 +0800
> > Adrian Chadd пишет:
> >
> >> What is FBFS?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Adrian
> > :)
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:02:40 +0300
Andriy Gapon пишет:
> on 18/10/2011 17:38 Ivan Klymenko said the following:
> > В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:22:29 +0300
> > Andriy Gapon пишет:
> >
> >> on 18/10/2011 17:17 Ivan Klymenko said the following:
> >>> В Tue, 18
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:02:47 +0800
Adrian Chadd пишет:
> What is FBFS?
>
>
>
> Adrian
:)
http://rudot.blog.com/
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mai
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:22:29 +0300
Andriy Gapon пишет:
> on 18/10/2011 17:17 Ivan Klymenko said the following:
> > В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:03:51 +0300
> > Andriy Gapon пишет:
> >
> >> on 18/10/2011 16:26 Ivan Klymenko said the following:
> >>> В Tue, 18
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:03:51 +0300
Andriy Gapon пишет:
> on 18/10/2011 16:26 Ivan Klymenko said the following:
> > В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:00:48 +0300
> > Andriy Gapon пишет:
> >
> >> on 18/10/2011 14:30 Ivan Klymenko said the following:
> >>> В Tue, 1
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:00:48 +0300
Andriy Gapon пишет:
> on 18/10/2011 14:30 Ivan Klymenko said the following:
> > В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:04:36 +0300
> > Urmas Lett пишет:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> Why is ffmpeg -threads massively slower with ULE
В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:04:36 +0300
Urmas Lett пишет:
> Hello.
>
> Why is ffmpeg -threads massively slower with ULE than 4BSD?
>
> ffmpeg preset veryfast with sched_bsd:
> real1m49.407s
> user6m53.932s
> sys 0m1.700s
>
> ffmpeg preset veryfast with sched_ule:
> real2m52.711s
> us
21 matches
Mail list logo
