slow tar performance on fbsd5

ld! Give it a try. Best reagrds, JG ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

turn write cache on, use: camcontrol modepage daX -m8 -P0 -e then put "1" after WCE in your favourite editor. Regards, JG ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To u

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

ql-m.tgz 1.207u 16.371s 7:01.06 4.1% 164+278k 8030+7176io 4pf+0w JG ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

sult could be much better than it was. So is my problem only FreeBSD5 releated? Seems to be. JG ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

> cannot this be related to low value of nswbufs (fixed in curennt and I think > releng_6)? Do you mean http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84903 or sth else? Jarek G ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Re[6]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

> Now I say, what about > # cpio -i < mysql-m.tgz > (assuming that mysql-m.tgz is in "tar" format)? Hello, idea is good, but the result is the same :/ JG ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

> Anyway, you could try the dd thing; something like > # dd if=mysql-m.tgz | tar -zxvf - > and see if it makes any diference. Not for me, I've very similar result. Is there way to do something reverse - extract tar file to stdout or sth. and then "d

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

> Will noatime make a difference when unpacking a tar archive (assuming an > otherwise idle system, at least)? My understanding of atime is that it > might slow down the disk for later accesses due to atime writes, but > when creating files it shouldn't have any effect. Is that not correct? Yes,

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

ull real0m1.640s user0m0.833s sys 0m0.808s Seems like a cached. First time 7,5 sec, each next time it takes only 1.6secs. I checked it with the other file and result is the same. Anyway, it's only a few secs difference, so the problem must be with write. Any

Re[2]: slow tar performance on fbsd5

> Gentoo is using GNU tar, 5.4 is using bsdtar. Try installing gtar on > FreeBSD and see what the time is. "I've tested bsdtar and gtar from ports (btw. gtar seems to be faster)." It's not big difference. JG ___ freeb

slow tar performance on fbsd5

pdatedb and Gentoo's updatedb disabled. Thank you for any opinions or hints how to tune FreeBSD a bit. Best Regards, JG ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"