Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:34:42 +0200, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No effect, the process grows happily. I don't have a core dump. Hmm, sorry, then I have no further idea of chasing the problem. A few points that may help: - can you show the diff you applied to bin/named/main.c when yo

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:22:38 +0200, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry again for the long delay, I've got other work to do, and our 9.4 > servers work fine (at least on FreeBSD 6, though, see the other > -performance- problem)... No problem, I understand testing a beta version canno

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:30:07 -0700, JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, is this reproduceable on FreeBSD 6.x? If so, then I'd like to > see what happens if you specify some small value of datasize > (e.g. 512MB) and have named abort when malloc() fails with the "X" > _malloc_options.

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:59:15 +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, then please try this patch with '-n 1' (note: this patch doesn't > > contain the memory statistics hack via the HTTP interface, but I don't > > we don't need it for this test). [...] > (max-cache-size still 32M)

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:06:58 +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course. See the bindn1 files at the same location. (only the memory > section included) > The effect is pretty much the same. Okay, then please try this patch with '-n 1' (note: this patch doesn't contain the memory

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:24:25 +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, if bind was built with threads, the memory usage always grew behind > max-cache-size very quickly. > > Here is the log: > http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/bind950-memory-20080203/bind950b1 > the memory usage (RSS,

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

At Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:40:39 +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Without threading I don't see this effect, the memory usage stops at a > >> sane limit and it's size can be affected by setting the max-cache-size > >> option. > >> > >> I don't think you would gain anything usable w