On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:40 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Thus to see what people were seeing perf wise.
HTT good for *some* workload? Definitely yes.
HTT good for yours? It depends.
It is not a solution to boost everything.
You really need your own evaluation methods for your own real world workload.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I've found that a memcpy heavy load (read: normal, non-zero copy
> network traffic) brings SMT threads to their knees. A pair of threads
> gets as much work done in normal UDP transmit/receive as a single
> non-SMT thread. It looks like it's b
> Il 29/04/13 14:20, Jia-Shiun Li ha scritto:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Davide D'Amico
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, I'm doing performance tests on a DELL R720, follows dmesg:
>>>
>>> Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project.
&g
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Davide D'Amico
wrote:
> Hi, I'm doing performance tests on a DELL R720, follows dmesg:
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
> The Regents of the University of California.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Stephen Sanders
wrote:
> According to pciconf, the card is a "82598EB 10 Gigabit AF Dual Port
> Network Connection".
>
> It looks to me like the card is plugged into a 4xPCIe slot. I'm sure
> this means we're not going to make the 10Gbps but I would imagine that
>
