Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS

2006-01-18 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 05:11:15PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:58:47PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:42:02AM -0800, Arne Woerner wrote: > > > Did you do those "dd" tests with small block sizes (like 1byte: > >

Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS

2006-01-18 Thread Jim C. Nasby
SQL does 8kB I/O by default. This can only be changed by modifying a header file. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect[EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want

Re: mysql 4.1.13 performance

2005-08-22 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:09:20PM +0200, OxY wrote: > i know there was a topic about fbsd vs linux mysql perf, but > what i need is just a few compile and .cnf options to improve the stuff > as much as possible, not to chase linux.. Then why aren't you asking on the mysql lists? --

Re: changing max_connections in postgresql on FreeBSD 5.4

2005-08-22 Thread Jim C. Nasby
configure it so that your data isn't safe at all, which would be an apples-oranges comparison to PostgreSQL. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect[EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go to

Re: mysql performance?

2005-06-14 Thread Jim C. Nasby
You should take a look at the context switch rate, which is apparentnly sometimes an issue on Xeons. Switching to PostgreSQL might help too. ;P -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows

Re: Regression testing (was Re: Performance issue)

2005-05-10 Thread Jim C. Nasby
ings that will eventually go into PostgreSQL itself, and it's been a big benefit when it comes to bringing people together to work on something. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Window

Re: 64bit CPUs

2005-05-02 Thread Jim C. Nasby
rom what I've seen on the PostgreSQL lists, PostgreSQL sees a huge (30%) performance increase on Opterons over Xeons, and other databases see 10-15%. I haven't seen 32 bit vs 64 bit numbers, but I would expect the increase to be even larger than Xeon to Opteron numbers. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database C

Re: 64bit CPUs

2005-05-02 Thread Jim C. Nasby
y is memory bandwidth, which the Opterons have much more of than other CPUs. So any application that needs to move a lot of data, whether a database or a router, will benefit. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distribute