Re: slow tar performance on fbsd5

tly some work on disk schedulers (even a Summer of Code project), but it will most likely not make it into 5.x. -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Regression testing (was Re: Performance issue)

egin? ;-) This has been proposed before and has been (to my knowledge) universally accepted as a Good Idea. If you have the interest and time to devote to it, I would urge you to work on it. The benefit to the community would be huge. -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D

Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x

usr/bin/time -h dd of=/dev/null if=/usr/testfile bs=64k count=10 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 655360 bytes transferred in 102.288822 secs (64069562 bytes/sec) 1m42.29s real 0.20s user 1m4.52s sys -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP

Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x

transferred in 32.028544 secs (204617482 bytes/sec) 32.02s real 0.02s user 2.73s sys Look at the difference in sys times for raw vs. filesystem reads. With raw we're at 2.73s while reading from the filesystem requires 12.33s! From my position of complete ignorance tha

Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x

f=/usr/testfile of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10 Read: 152Mb/s -- Jonathan Noack | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature