up in the iLO management log, and in a
"camcontrol inquiry".
Kevin Way
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:51:55PM -0400, Kevin Way wrote:
I built 7.0 as of 6 days ago, and ran the same test using 8-cores, ULE
and 4BSD. The results are available at:
http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2007/04/11/postgresql-scaling-on-6-2-and-7-0
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Kevin Way wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
If so, then your task is the following:
Make SYSV semaphores less dumb about process wakeups. Currently
whenever the semaphore state changes, all processes sleeping on the
semaphore are woken, even if we only
of the 2-core system as the # of threads hits 5.
All other (non-pgsql, non-sysv) tests came back approximately as
expected, but I'm left wondering if I did something wrong, or if 8 cpus
are slower than 2, when it comes to Postgres on currently available FreeBSD.
Kevin Way
Inside Systems
