On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:27:24PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
>
> >I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's MFC
> >[2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr
Hi,
I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's
MFC [2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr
instead of libpthread (via libmap.conf) and build bind with threads
option. In the new test I did this.
I used the same methodology, same zone file and sa
Hi Alessandro,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:27:57AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p25 (NEW_KERNEL_NO_RAID)
>
> fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
> status: active
>
I have some problems [1] with FreeBSD 6.1 and bge
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:11:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I've seen a packets drop with high rate of radius authentication request
> (UDP 150 byte)
> The software is radiator (perl), and it seems not to be dependent on CPU
> speed.
> How is possible to avoid this with a more
> The FreeBSD pthread library and BIND don't work well together. If
> you use the libthr library, performance goes up.
I still didn't make tests with this lib, but I rebuilt everything on
FreeBSD 6.0 and got nice numbers:
DNS performance numbers on FreeBSD 6.0
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:52:33PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> These results looks very puzzling to me.
> As far as I know, multithreading and/or multiprocessors should perform
> better anyway than a single threaded application within other
> applications on an UP box. Strange results ...And more
> >I made some tests using 7.x with all the debugging disabled:
> >
> > queries / s
> >
> >Int bind (d_t) bind (e_t) nsd (1_s) nsd (2_s)
> >--- -- -- - -
> >
> >bge 15439 14733
> FYI: In response to feedback from ISC, there are UDP transmit optimizations
> in FreeBSD 7.x. These have a relatively minor performance impact for
> single-threaded applications, but in the special case of BIND accessing a
> single UDP socket from many different threads, it significantly impr
Dave, could you please describe you test set?
I've posted some results months ago and they were kind different.
I have done some tests [1] [2] with bind and queryperf and my result
on FreeBSD 6.1 was very poor if compared with 4.11.
Besides this, I have had bad results with NSD + 6.1 too and it
