István a écrit : have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
you might have overlooked it. yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :) On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael [1]<s4mm...@gmail.com> wrote: Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read the documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark. What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this version, but test results are the same as in 8.0 Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason to be suprised. _______________________________________________ [2]freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org mailing list [3]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [4]freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" greetings maybe it is just a dumb thought, but aio is enabled by default on linux kernels for vfs r/w operations? -- Ce message a été vérifié par [5]MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a été trouvé. CRI UPVD http://www.univ-perp.fr References 1. 3D"mailto:s4mm...@gmail.com" 2. 3D"mailto:freebsd-performa...@fr 3. 3D"http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman 4. 3D"mailto:freebsd-performance-un 5. 3D"http://www.mailscanner.info/" _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"