T4) to FreeBSD (ZFS or UFS)
- if we want to use PostgreSQL on FreeBSD, we prefer UFS to ZFS
P.S: Our webservers still run FreeBSD and e.g. OpenIndiana (Solaris)
performed much worse in our high load real-world web application.
--
Martin Matuska
42cc.8020...@freebsd.org>, Martin Matuska writes:
>
>> But what I can say, e.g. for the Intel Atom processor, if there are
>> performance gains in all but one test (that falls 2% behind), generic
>> perl code (the routines benchmarked) on this processor is very likely to
>
sts, I
can say it is very likely that it will run slower. But again, I am
benchmarking just a subset of generic perl functions.
Cheers,
mm
Dňa 11.03.2011 15:01, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote / napísal(a):
> In message <4d7943b1.1030...@freebsd.org>, Martin Matuska writes:
>
>> More
Hi everyone,
we have performed a benchmark of the perl binary compiled with base gcc,
ports gcc and ports clang using the perlbench benchmark suite.
Our benchmark was performed solely on amd64 with 10 different processors
and we have tried different -march= flags to compare binary performance
of t
