RE: ixgbe: Network performance tuning (#TCP connections)

2016-02-05 Thread Meyer, Wolfgang
(#TCP connections) > > On 2016-02-05 13:05, Meyer, Wolfgang wrote: > > > > > > > As I was telling in my original message, the rxd and txd values were more or > less the only ones that changed my numbers to the better when reducing > them. Not that I understood that

RE: ixgbe: Network performance tuning (#TCP connections)

2016-02-05 Thread Meyer, Wolfgang
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > performa...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Allan Jude > Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 22:50 > To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: ixgbe: Network performance tuning (#TCP connections) >

RE: ixgbe: Network performance tuning (#TCP connections)

2016-02-05 Thread Meyer, Wolfgang
formance tuning (#TCP connections) > > Also - check for txq overruns and rxq drops in sysctl. 64 is very low on > FreeBSD. You may also look in to increasing the size of your pcb hash table. > > > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Allan Jude wrote: > > On 2016-02-03 08:37,

ixgbe: Network performance tuning (#TCP connections)

2016-02-03 Thread Meyer, Wolfgang
Hello, we are evaluating network performance on a DELL-Server (PowerEdge R930 with 4 Sockets, hw.model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8891 v3 @ 2.80GHz) with 10 GbE-Cards. We use programs that on server side accepts connections on a IP-address+port from the client side and after establishing the conn