On Nov 23, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Michael Conlen wrote:
Sorry if this is the wrong place for this, but I haven't been
getting answers elsewhere.
I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large mmap()'s in a
single process space, s
On Nov 23, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Arne Wörner wrote:
--- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Arne Wörner wrote:
Maybe the stack size matters in ur case somehow? I can see,
that
it is limited to 1GB, isn't it?
I found something funny, too:
lim
On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Arne Wörner wrote:
--- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 23, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Arne Wörner wrote:
--- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large
mmap()'s in a
I had a simil
On Nov 23, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Arne Wörner wrote:
--- Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large
mmap()'s in a
I had a similar problem with shared memory.
I found an option in /sys/conf/NOTES.
I think it could help in
Sorry if this is the wrong place for this, but I haven't been getting
answers elsewhere.
I'm trying to tune the system to allow very large mmap()'s in a
single process space, something on the order of 1.5 GB so I can pass
very large values for -Xms and -Xmx to java. I know I had been able
