On Thursday 14 June 2007 05:48:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 6.2 was used from CVS with libthr and the 4BSD scheduler (ULE 1.0 is
> broken in 6.x).
just curious what is broken because I use ULE on several servers perfectly. it
seems to me that ULE is even faster on SMP when not having heavy load.
Al
On Thursday 14 June 2007 06:59:41 Thomas Vogt wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thats sounds nice. You wrote "The goal of the PmcTools project is to
> provide FreeBSD's developers and system administrators with
> non-intrusive, low-overhead and innovative ways of measuring and
> analysing system performance" your we
On Friday 01 June 2007 11:30:24 Arne Wörner wrote:
> --- NOC Prowip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why dönt u use glabel?
> >
> > hmm, I never considered it
> > but I guess it does not solve my problem because let's say da0 is the
> > provider and da0 might have still the label I gave it but t
Hi all
I am not sure if this is exactly the right list but perhaps some could point
me to it.
I think it is not the best way having different hard disk device names. I
think it should be generally hd or something independent of type, driver or
controller.
Once I had trouble because I needed t
On Friday 02 March 2007 06:45, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> blah blah blah deleted
>
idem ;)
> > Before digging into this problem deeper with benchmarks, could anyone
> > explain why FreeBSD reaches this 33 MB/s limit (sounds like UDMA 33
>
> man mount
>
> read section on "async"
>
> linux by defau
On Monday 22 January 2007 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> It's not stable on 5.x ...
>
yup, this one I learned already the hard way ;)
> See
> http://freebsd.monkey.org/freebsd-performance/200510/msg00015.html
I never found this before, mille grazie!
Hans
A mensagem foi sc
Hi
it is 5.5-Stable SMP i386, but I have not possibility to upgrade at this time,
so I wonder if somebody might have an idea here.
net.isr.enable=1 gives me a great performance boost as long as the machine is
running
I have MySQL running on it and I get two possible results
or one of the MyS
On Saturday 14 October 2006 15:05, Mike Horwath wrote:
> > I would say this preference is mostly set by beeing afraid of
> > migration (lots of things can come up when migrating a production
> > server) or by lack of money to buy some nasty HW ...
>
> Ah, hardware bigotry. Your colors are showing.
On Saturday 14 October 2006 17:13, Danial Thom wrote:
> The fact that a processor has 2 cores doesn't
> mean you have to use them, just like a MB with 2
> sockets doesn't need both to be used. If the OS
> is faster with 1 processor than 2, then you only
> use one of the cores. The concept that you
