On Friday 01 June 2007 10:14:23 Arne Wörner wrote:
> --- NOC Meganet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it is not the best way having different hard disk device names. I
> > think it should be generally hd or something independent of type, driver
> > or controller.
>
> Why dönt u use glabel
On Sunday 15 October 2006 11:29, Danial Thom wrote:
> Unfortunately, FreeBSD 6.x with 4 processors
> can't beat 4.x with one, which is the entire
> point of this thread.
well well
even if you were that clever guy you pretend to be you're not entitled to
offend people with stupid, idiot, clown an
On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:38, Mike Horwath wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:13:24AM -0300, NOC Prowip wrote:
> > Hi, I am hooking in here without any intention to fire things up but
> > isn 't this discussion certainly useless? Not only 4.11 is gone but
> > also
> Linux 2.6 is not suitable for uniprocessor, nor
> is FreeBSD 6. The difference is that Linux scales
> with MP, and FreeBSD doesn't. So the case to keep
> 4.x as an option is an easy one to make.
>
Hi, I am hooking in here without any intention to fire things up but isn 't
this discussion cert
