On 12/18/11 04:34, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The trouble is that there's lots of anecdotal evidence, but noone's
really gone digging deep into _their_ example of why it's broken. The
developers who know this stuff don't see anything wrong. That hints to
me it may be something a little more creepy - as an example, the
interplay between netisr/swi/taskqueue/callbacks and such. It may be
that something is being starved that isn't obviously obvious. It's
just a stab in the dark, but it sounds somewhat plausible based on
what I've seen ULE do in my network throughput hacking.
I applaud reppie for trying to make it as easy as possible for people
to use KTR to provide scheduler traces for him to go digging with, so
please, if you have these issues and you can absolutely reproduce
them, please follow his instructions and work with him to get him what
he needs.
The thing I've seen is that ULE is substantially more enthusiastic about
migrating processes between cores than 4BSD. Often, this is a good
thing, but can increase the rate of cache misses, hurting performance
for cache-bound processes (I see this particularly in HPC-type
scientific workloads). It might be interesting to add some kind of
tunable here.
Another more interesting and slightly longer-term possibility if someone
wants a project would be to integrate scheduling decisions with hwpmc
counters, to accumulate statistics on cache hits at each context switch
and preferentially keep processes with a high hits/misses ratio on the
same thread/cache domain relative to processes with a low one.
-Nathan
P.S. The other thing that could be very interesting from a research and
scheduling standpoint would be to integrate heterogeneous SMP support
into the operating system, with a FreeBSD-4 "Application Processor"
syscall model. We seem to be going down the road where GPGPU computing
has MMUs, timer interrupts, IPIs, etc. (the next AMD Fusions, IBM Cell),
as well as potential systems with both x86 and ARM cores. This is
something that no operating system currently supports well, and would be
a place for BSD to shine. If anyone has a free graduate student...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"