Andriy Gapon wrote:
> What mode do you have set for your controllers in BIOS?
> AHCI or IDE/Legacy/etc?
Yeah I read about this too but my BIOS offers only "RAID" and "SATA" -
tried both so I think AHCI is just not supported on my K8T800Pro chipset
for the SATA contro
+++
Latency 36642us2973us 30053us 12843us 30014us 30030us
As you can see linux has a much higher data transfer rate on both
controller than FreeBSD offers. Any sugestions?
--
Oliver Lehmann
http://www.pofo.de/
http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
Robert Noland writes:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:53 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
I got a Promise SATA300 TX2plus instead. I'll rune some tests with later
(when I'm back home ;))
I would also be curious how that ahci driver from -CURRENT is performing
relative to other implementat
Daniel O'Connor writes:
In the end I got a PCI Silicon Image 3114 based controller and it worked
fine.
I thought about getting a controller with a SiL-Chil too because they are
kinda cheap and another system I intend to use with SATA harddisks has no
SATA on-board. But then I searched throug
Hi,
I got 4 new SATA disks (WD Green, 1TB, WD10EADS) I want to use to replace
my old 250GB disks attached to my 3ware controller.
I want to reuse the old 250GB disks in some systems running old PATA disks
ight now as system drives. So what I did now was gathering SATA performance
tatistics with th
probably not spend the money buying a RAID controller again
but use indeed ZFS instead. But back the time there was only (g)vinum -
and I never liked it.
--
Oliver Lehmann
http://www.pofo.de/
http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
___
freebs
3.
What do you guys think.
Please keep me CCed - I'm not subscribed.
--
Oliver Lehmann
http://www.pofo.de/
http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perfor
