Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
My beef with the DNS tests was that ISC ran out and bought
the hardware FIRST, -then- they started testing. This is
directly contrary to every bit of advice ever given in
the computer industry for the last 50 years - you select
the software FIRST, -then- you buy the hard
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I think the card in question is twa in this case.
Not in our case...
-=-
twe0: <3ware Storage Controller. Driver version 1.50.01.002> port
0x9c00-0x9c0f mem 0xfb6ffc00-0xfb6ffc0f,0xfa80-0xfaff irq 29 at
device 3.0 on pci1
twe0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
twe0: [ITHREAD]
Manjunath R Gowda wrote:
> On 12/1/07, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 3ware driver is under GIANT at 7.x. I don't know if it's the same for
>> linux.
>
> It is not under GIANT any more, MPSAFE starting from 7.0 BETA1.
I know in one case on a box running BETA2 the kernel dmesg re
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Is that using PAE or AMD64 ?
amd64 in both cases (Linux and FreeBSD)
-Peter
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ivan Voras wrote:
> I agree in general, but MySQL performance is very exposed as an advocacy
> issue - it has traditionally been the source of statements like
> "FreeBSD's threading implementation is weak/bad/broken".
And these days ISC can't consciously recommend FreeBSD for use on
high-traffic
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 03:36 pm, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Anyone got any SATA RAID 5 controllers they can recommend
> 64Bit PCIX.
I personally would reccommend the HighPoint RocketRAID series (we use the
1820A here on a dual Opteron system running 5.4/amd64) We are using the
HP-provided hp
Steven Hartland wrote:
> 5.4-STABLE Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 ( 5 disk )
> dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
> 65536 bytes transferred in 13.348032 secs (49097875 bytes/sec)
Have you tried the driver supplied by Highpoint as a pre-compiled
