Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-18 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel: > No, the same hardware was used for each OS. > > In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used. Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is mo

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

2011-12-18 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 16.12.2011 08:06, schrieb O. Hartmann: > For the underlying OS, as far as I know, the compiler hasn't as much > impact as on userland software since autovectorization and other neat > things are not used during system build. > > From my experience using gcc 4.2 or 4.4/4.5 does not have an impac