RE: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-12 Thread Tamouh H.
> > Anyway, people should stop complaining, and start offering up > hardware, net connections, and man power to support a cvs > repo/packages/etc for the 4.x tree if they want it. That's > what people do, and that's the beauty of open source. > > > Eric > I agree, however, there appears

FBSD 5.x CPU performance on MSVS 2005

2006-05-21 Thread Tamouh H.
Hi, I've been doing some testing with Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2 and FreeBSD, so far compatibility has been great across the board with all versions of FreeBSD from 4.x - 7.x on IDE based virtual drives (no compatibility with SCSI driver). However, on FreeBSD 5.x I noticed the CPU detec

Adaptec 2230SLP RAID-5 slow on FreeBSD 5.4

2006-03-13 Thread Tamouh H.
Hi, We're having trouble getting reasonable performance with an Adaptec 2230SLP (FreeBSD shows it as 2130S SCSI U320) and latest FreeBSD 5.4 snapshot using AAC drivers : __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/aac/aac.c,v 1.101.2.5 We're comparing diskinfo -t data between SCSI U320 and another mac