Re: PHP with open_basedir performance problem

2008-01-27 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Miroslav Lachman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > As I reported a year ago - problem occured in 5.1.6 (maybe 5.1.5 - I > never tried it, I jumped from 5.1.4 to 5.1.6 or newer). Can somebody > look at PHP sources of those two versions and find the "bad change"? Handily I have 5.1.4 sources right nex

Re: PHP with open_basedir performance problem

2008-01-27 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Miroslav Lachman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I found a painful performance problem with Apache + PHP 5 when > open_basedir directive is enabled. Looks like it's lstat()/readlink() overhead. I wrote a simple bit of PHP similar to yours, but doing 10 * 1000 require "foo/%d/%d.php" calls from th

Re: Which SMP CPU for FreeBSD 6.2?

2007-07-18 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Jack Toering ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > These are things I need to hear bacause it doesn't make sense for me to > watch these things until I'm in the market because the technology moves so > fast. > > Thank you very much for your response! You probably don't need to follow every move, but it

Re: PHP Performance problem after upgrade to 5.1.6 or 5.2.0

2007-02-03 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Miroslav Lachman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I am not using any PHP bytecode cache. Well, if you used one perhaps you'd have enough power to be N+1, not just N going on N-1 ;) > About one year ago I tried eAccelerator which causes Apache freeze. Are you using a threaded MPM? Try using prefo

Re: PHP Performance problem after upgrade to 5.1.6 or 5.2.0

2007-02-03 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Miroslav Lachman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have performance problem with PHP after upgrading from PHP 5.1.4 to > newer version regardles if newer version is 5.1.6 or 5.2.0. I tested > both with same result. Every time I upgrade PHP and see a performace regregression like this, it's been a

Re: Finding what's causing I/O

2005-09-26 Thread Thomas Hurst
* martinko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > well, thanks for the switch. i couldn't find any > description/explanation of/on the columns (VCSW,..) in top(1) man > page, though. :( VCSW = Voluntary Context Switch IVCSW = Involuntary Context Switch A very nice article on the meaning of these is here:

Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?

2005-06-24 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Arkadi Shishlov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I use the em cards (Intel Pro 1000/MT's and the like) in many > > machines here, and they are rock solid. You'll pay a little more > > for them, but there is a reason for it. > > Whats about performance and stability with MTU > 1500? I tried > incr