Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
>>>
>> Robert,
>>
>> ok, I looked and it looks like the port compiles statically, and I was
>> able to grab the binary from the old disk and move it over to the new
>> one...
>>
>> here is info now on how it is linked :
>>
>> [root ~]# ldd ubench.5.4
>> ubench.5.4:
>>
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> I have recently had the opportunity to upgrade a few servers from old
>> versions of 5.4 to 7.0, and have seen some interesting data. Before
>> doing this, I wanted to take some benchmarks to see how
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> Is there anything that I can do on this latest 7.0 box that might be
>> useful information???
>
> Someone will need to repeat this under controlled conditions. It's
> quite a surprising result.
>
> Kris
Kris,
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Tim Traver wrote:
I have recently had the opportunity to upgrade a few servers from old
versions of 5.4 to 7.0, and have seen some interesting data. Before
doing this, I wanted to take some benchmarks to see how the scripts
that I would run would
but I was using the 7.0 stable source that I
checked out about a week and a half ago...Is that not the current???
Tim.
* Tim Traver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080812 14:39] wrote:
Hi All,
I have recently had the opportunity to upgrade a few servers from old
versions of 5.4 to 7.0, an
Hi All,
I have recently had the opportunity to upgrade a few servers from old
versions of 5.4 to 7.0, and have seen some interesting data. Before
doing this, I wanted to take some benchmarks to see how the scripts that
I would run would fare between the two versions, and the results are
somew
