Re: Limiting open port RST response from 247 to 200 packets per second

2009-02-10 Thread kama
Ehm, you have posted the exact same lines from the log... Until you find new lines you are probably fine... /Bjorn On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Alex Dehaini wrote: > Any ideas > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Alex Dehaini wrote: > > > I increased net.inet.icmp.icmplim to 2000 but this does not make

Re: HP Smart Array 6i opinions

2006-03-08 Thread kama
I have used the whole range (or somewhat) for internal SA's. Starting with the internal one in DL380R1 and up to G4. Performance of 6i in freebsd is better than 5i, but worse than if you insert a external card (6402/6404). I mostly use the internal SA as systemdisk only on systems with a lot of d

Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x

2005-05-03 Thread kama
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Anderson writes: > > >Don't mean to be terse here, but I'm talking about the same test done an > >two different RAID5 configurations, with different disks, and not just > >me - other users in this very thread see

Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x

2005-05-02 Thread kama
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Eric Anderson wrote: > I'll be honest here, I don't care much if the speed difference between > 4.X and 5.X is measureable, or whatever. What I find is a little > telling of an issue somewhere, is that READS are slower than WRITES! > This is totally bogus to me - dd'ing a fi

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-29 Thread kama
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Steven Hartland wrote: > Just retried with a ~10Gb data set: > Write to FS: > dd if=/dev/zero of=.testfile bs=1m count=1 > 1+0 records in > 1+0 records out > 1048576 bytes transferred in 92.517222 secs (113338466 bytes/sec) > > Read from FS: > dd if=.testfile