Hi,
> I think most people just want you to use the exact same configuration
> file on both systems and verify that both use the same pre-compiled
> options as well. Probably the best thing to do is build from source
> on both linux and freebsd with the same options. Make sure the
> defau
rwatson wrote @ Sat, 20 May 2006 18:25:14 +0100 (BST):
> I'm set up to easily benchmark FreeBSD in our netperf cluster, but I'm not
> set
> up to easily do comparisons with Linux, since we don't have a pluggable
> netboot Linux to install in that environment. If someone wants to provide
> som
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Ivan Voras wrote:
Michael Vince wrote:
What I am trying to say here is you are expecting good performance out of
things like CGI/PHP and prefork,
Ok, did anybody read my initial post?
I'm NOT setting up a production machine. I'm NOT using PHP - it was
mentioned as a r
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Ivan Voras wrote:
If I was working on a project such as Apache I know I wouldn't be
concentrating of performance with prefork in this day when threaded modes
are where Apache has been aiming for modern high performance web serving
for a fair while now.
Did you miss disc
On May 19, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
Michael Vince wrote:
What I am trying to say here is you are expecting good performance
out of things like CGI/PHP and prefork,
Ok, did anybody read my initial post?
I'm NOT setting up a production machine. I'm NOT using PHP - it was
menti
Michael Vince wrote:
What I am trying to say here is you are expecting good performance out
of things like CGI/PHP and prefork,
Ok, did anybody read my initial post?
I'm NOT setting up a production machine. I'm NOT using PHP - it was
mentioned as a reason threaded apache is not widely used.
Ivan Voras wrote:
Michael Vince wrote:
Interesting that the linux you are claiming to use would use prefork
Apache as default, while this is the default on FreeBSD I would think
the threaded worker would be used on a lot of linux dists, since they
don't have the option to easily rebuild it.
On May 18, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
Using lighttpd or ab on other host is not really applicable - I
wasn't trying to configure the box for production, only ran the
benchmarks out of curiosity. Apache *should* work ok out of the box
on FreeBSD :)
(btw. apache was installed fro
Michael Vince wrote:
Interesting that the linux you are claiming to use would use prefork
Apache as default, while this is the default on FreeBSD I would think
the threaded worker would be used on a lot of linux dists, since they
don't have the option to easily rebuild it.
"Professional" Linux
Interesting that the linux you are claiming to use would use prefork
Apache as default, while this is the default on FreeBSD I would think
the threaded worker would be used on a lot of linux dists, since they
don't have the option to easily rebuild it.
Even if it is using prefork, the Linux Apa
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Vlad GALU wrote:
On 5/19/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 18, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> Using lighttpd or ab on other host is not really applicable - I
> wasn't trying to configure the box for production, only ran the
> benc
On 5/19/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 18, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> Using lighttpd or ab on other host is not really applicable - I
> wasn't trying to configure the box for production, only ran the
> benchmarks out of curiosity. Apache *should*
Sorry, I forgot about performance@ mailing list, moving the discussion
there - please use performance at freebsd.org or equivalent address when
replying (and drop current@).
Steve Hodgson wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Today I had the opportunity to experiment for a short time with a
4-CPU Xeon ma
13 matches
Mail list logo
