On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:57:54, David Wolfskill wrote:
DW> The only hardware upgrade was to increase RAM from 6GB to 96GB,
DW> which was done for all of the machines being discussed.
FYI: RAM size increase can cause performance regression, probably due to
decreased CPU TLB cache hit rate.
_
Hi David,
How about just picking a revision of stable/8 half way between the good and
not good version, then re-test?
It'd help to narrow down the range of commits that could've caused problems.
-adrian
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:02:47PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 19:28, David Wolfskill wrote:> At work, we have a bunch of
> machines that developers use to build some
> > software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx
> > (with a few local patches, which have s
On 10/10/13 10:02 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 07/10/2013 19:28, David Wolfskill wrote:> At work, we have a bunch of
machines that developers use to build some
software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx
(with a few local patches, which have since been committed to stable
On 07/10/2013 19:28, David Wolfskill wrote:> At work, we have a bunch of
machines that developers use to build some
> software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx
> (with a few local patches, which have since been committed to stable/8),
> and the software is built within
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:19:38PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> ...
> > In examining the CPU utilization graphs, the CPU generally looks
> > about 5% busy for the first 15 minutes; this would be bmake determining
> > dependency graphs, I expect.
>
> Is that one process using 100% of one core,
Den 07/10/2013 kl. 19.28 skrev David Wolfskill :
> In examining the CPU utilization graphs, the CPU generally looks
> about 5% busy for the first 15 minutes; this would be bmake determining
> dependency graphs, I expect.
Is that one process using 100% of one core, or many processes using 5% tota
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:32:57AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2013 1:28 PM, "David Wolfskill" wrote:
> >
> > At work, we have a bunch of machines that developers use to build some
> > software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx
> > (with a few local patches,
On Oct 7, 2013 1:28 PM, "David Wolfskill" wrote:
>
> At work, we have a bunch of machines that developers use to build some
> software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx
> (with a few local patches, which have since been committed to stable/8),
> and the software is bui
At work, we have a bunch of machines that developers use to build some
software. The machines presently run FreeBSD/amd64 8.3-STABLE @rxx
(with a few local patches, which have since been committed to stable/8),
and the software is built within a 32-bit jail.
The hardware includes 2 packages o
10 matches
Mail list logo