Re: Bad performance while transfer large block size through NFS.

2007-06-02 Thread W�rner
> I set up one NFS server, and mounted on other server by TCP. Servers > connected with Giga network, and running 6.2-RELEASE. > > But I found the performance is very bad while transfering large block > size data. > I dont know if it makes any sense, but at least the following experiment might be f

Re: Bad performance while transfer large block size through NFS.

2007-06-02 Thread hshh
I tried, but not help. Still only 3798612 bytes/sec while block size is 2MBytes. On 6/1/07, Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I set up one NFS server, and mounted on other server by TCP. Servers > connected with Giga network, and running 6.2-RELEASE. > > But I found the performance is

Re: Bad performance while transfer large block size through NFS.

2007-06-01 Thread Claus Guttesen
I set up one NFS server, and mounted on other server by TCP. Servers connected with Giga network, and running 6.2-RELEASE. But I found the performance is very bad while transfering large block size data. For example, I use dd on NFS client to test the speed. And ``systat -vm 1'' is displayed HDD

Bad performance while transfer large block size through NFS.

2007-06-01 Thread hshh
I set up one NFS server, and mounted on other server by TCP. Servers connected with Giga network, and running 6.2-RELEASE. But I found the performance is very bad while transfering large block size data. For example, I use dd on NFS client to test the speed. # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test bs=16k