Re: Combine more operation within one system call: to do it, or not to do it?

2005-09-27 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Xin LI wrote: It seems that Microsoft has recently revised several of their APIs. One example is their ConnectEx(), as found in documentation [1]. The implementation is not so complex that it just combines more operation within one system call, however, this can reduce som

Re: Combine more operation within one system call: to do it, or not to do it?

2005-09-19 Thread Peter Wemm
On Monday 19 September 2005 02:42 am, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Mon, 2005-Sep-19 11:37:22 +0800, Xin LI wrote: > >It seems that Microsoft has recently revised several of their APIs. > > I think this is a regular occurence as part of their ongoing efforts > to minimise backward and forward compatibil

Re: Combine more operation within one system call: to do it, or not to do it?

2005-09-19 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Mon, 2005-Sep-19 11:37:22 +0800, Xin LI wrote: >It seems that Microsoft has recently revised several of their APIs. I think this is a regular occurence as part of their ongoing efforts to minimise backward and forward compatibility. > One example is their ConnectEx(), as found in documentatio

Combine more operation within one system call: to do it, or not to do it?

2005-09-18 Thread Xin LI
Dear folks, It seems that Microsoft has recently revised several of their APIs. One example is their ConnectEx(), as found in documentation [1]. The implementation is not so complex that it just combines more operation within one system call, however, this can reduce some unnecessary context swi