Arne Woerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Shane Ambler wrote:
> On 3/12/2005 3:14, "Arne Woerner"
> wrote:
> > Why should somebody want to keep CPU usage of a
> > process below a certain value (e. g. 20%)?
>
> Well if your machine isn't smp enabled (specifically
> pre-HTT) then one process ca
--- Shane Ambler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/12/2005 3:14, "Arne Woerner"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why should somebody want to keep CPU usage of a
> > process below a certain value (e. g. 20%)?
>
> Well if your machine isn't smp enabled (specifically
> pre-HTT) then one process can s
On 3/12/2005 3:14, "Arne Woerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It seems i cannot get a clear answer wherther it
>> is possible to limit a CPU usage by a user process
>> and should i do that at all.
>>
> Why should somebody want to keep CPU usage of a
--- Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems i cannot get a clear answer wherther it
> is possible to limit a CPU usage by a user process
> and should i do that at all.
>
Why should somebody want to keep CPU usage of a process below a
certain value (e. g. 20%)?
> As you can see in the fi
Hi Guys!
It seems i cannot get a clear answer wherther it is possible to limit a CPU
usage by a user process and should i do that at all.
I just wana run "tar -xzvf /usr/backup/pub.tar.gz /usr/home/pub" and do not
cause something like this:
PID USERNAME PRI NICESIZERE
