Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Petri Helenius writes:
>
>> The point in threading is that different threads can execute
>> simultaneously on multiple CPU's.
>
> What combination of FreeBSD+Mysql will have multiple threads run by
> different CPUs?
>
> In the few SMP FreeBSD + Mysql setups (mysql 4.X) t
Francisco Reyes wrote:
What combination of FreeBSD+Mysql will have multiple threads run by
different CPUs?
In the few SMP FreeBSD + Mysql setups (mysql 4.X) that I have at work
I only see mysql in one cpu as reported by top.
We tested FreeBSD 6.2 and Mysql 5.0 I'd say the main requirement will
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:16:54AM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Kris Kennaway writes:
>
> >Actually it will help the DB side, when you have multiple simultaneous
> >transactions - that's the point :)
>
> A little confused.
> Does this mean FreeBSD will split the threads into multiple CPUs?
Ye
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> What combination of FreeBSD+Mysql will have multiple threads run by
> different CPUs?
>
> In the few SMP FreeBSD + Mysql setups (mysql 4.X) that I have at work
> I only see mysql in one cpu as reported by top.
I just did the tests highlighted on the thread:
Progress on sc
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Petri Helenius writes:
The point in threading is that different threads can execute
simultaneously on multiple CPU's.
What combination of FreeBSD+Mysql will have multiple threads run by
different CPUs?
In the few SMP FreeBSD + Mysql setups (mysql 4.X) that I have at
Petri Helenius writes:
The point in threading is that different threads can execute
simultaneously on multiple CPU's.
What combination of FreeBSD+Mysql will have multiple threads run by
different CPUs?
In the few SMP FreeBSD + Mysql setups (mysql 4.X) that I have at work I only
see mysql i
Francisco Reyes wrote:
A little confused.
Does this mean FreeBSD will split the threads into multiple CPUs?
The point in threading is that different threads can execute
simultaneously on multiple CPU's.
Pete
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org ma
Kris Kennaway writes:
Actually it will help the DB side, when you have multiple simultaneous
transactions - that's the point :)
A little confused.
Does this mean FreeBSD will split the threads into multiple CPUs?
Or you meant the DB will do better because the load from other programs will
be
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:32:28PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Steven Hartland writes:
>
> >The software we will be running is vBulletin so apache +
> >php and mysql.
>
> Mysql is thread based. Quadcore will not help the DB side. Will help with
> the other components though, if you host ever
Steven Hartland writes:
The software we will be running is vBulletin so apache +
php and mysql.
Mysql is thread based. Quadcore will not help the DB side. Will help with
the other components though, if you host everything in the same machine.
___
On 23.02.2007, at 14:11, Steven Hartland wrote:
We have some Dual Dual Core's here but I'm considering
the Quad Core upgrade but am a little concerned that
this may start to become OS limited given the 8 Cores.
Well... It's definitely better on our Xeon 5355 compute servers
(Intel SR1500-based
I'm looking at new machines for high access forums / DB
and wonder if anyone has any experience with how well
FreeBSD specifically 6.2 scales on Dual Quad Core Intel's.
We have some Dual Dual Core's here but I'm considering
the Quad Core upgrade but am a little concerned that
this may start to be
I'm looking at new machines for high access forums / DB
and wonder if anyone has any experience with how well
FreeBSD specifically 6.2 scales on Dual Quad Core Intel's.
We have some Dual Dual Core's here but I'm considering
the Quad Core upgrade but am a little concerned that
this may start to be
13 matches
Mail list logo
