Martin MATO wrote:
>István a écrit :
>
> have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
>
> you might have overlooked it.
>
> yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :)
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael [1] wrote:
>
>
>
> Since the article says that
István a écrit :
have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
you might have overlooked it.
yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael [1] wrote:
Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
you might have overlooked it.
yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael wrote:
> > Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
> > this has a bit to
> Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
> this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read the
> documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is
> available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark.
but if we measure the performance based on feelings we could advertise
freebsd:
"feels better"
do not forget the marketing value :))
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Kip Macy wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:21 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Well, since FreeBSD 8.0 started, I realized on several
On Sep 29, 2009, at 4:21 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Well, since FreeBSD 8.0 started, I realized on several boxes (doens't
matter whether SMP or UP, 2 GB or 8 GB or 16 GB) massive performance
issues when compiling, even on a 8-core box. This is not 'measured' in
hard numbers, it is the 'feeling' s
makes no sense to stay with freebsd for zfs:
http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
I think this will not change soon. ZFS is, at this moment, the only
> thing that keeps me with FreeBSD. In every other case, serving, number
> crunching (oh, we need a lot of I/O performance in those number
> crun
Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/9/29 Randy Schultz :
>> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>>
>> |
>> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
>> | think
>> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
>> | read the
>> | documentation, and didn't se
2009/9/30 O. Hartmann :
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2009/9/29 Randy Schultz :
>>> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>>>
>>> |
>>> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
>>> | think
>>> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
>>> | read the
Andrew Kuriger wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:26:34 PDT, Dieter
> wrote:
>> In message ,
>> Francisco Reyes writes:
>>> Steven Hartland writes:
>>>
Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
Comments?
2009/9/29 István :
> withdtrac...@#!#@! :)
>
> I think that the most interesting opionion these benchmarks tell is
>> that we are slow on random, threaded I/O operations. I think we need
>> to investigate more in this direction.
First thing, it would be interesting if someone could be rep
withdtrac...@#!#@! :)
I think that the most interesting opionion these benchmarks tell is
> that we are slow on random, threaded I/O operations. I think we need
> to investigate more in this direction.
>
> Attilio
>
>
> --
> Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
>
2009/9/29 Randy Schultz :
>
> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>
> |
> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
> | think
> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
> | read the
> | documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Randy Schultz wrote:
>
> - "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
>
> |
> | Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
> | think
> | this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
> | read the
> | documentation, and didn't
- "Andrew Kuriger" spaketh thusly:
|
| Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I
| think
| this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to
| read the
| documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which
| is
| available in ports,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:26:34 PDT, Dieter
wrote:
> In message ,
> Francisco Reyes writes:
>> Steven Hartland writes:
>>
>> > Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
>> >
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
>> > Comments?
>>
>> This was discussed in
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:29 AM, István wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-current&m=125413848303229&w=2
>
>
well I didn't knew that fresh one. Nice to know. Gona test for RC too.
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Francisco Reyes >wrote:
>
> > Steven Hartland writes:
> >
> > Just noticed
In message , Francisco
Reyes writes:
> Steven Hartland writes:
>
> > Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
> > Comments?
>
> This was discussed in detail in slashdot.. starting with the fact that most
> lik
http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-current&m=125413848303229&w=2
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Steven Hartland writes:
>
> Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
>> Comments?
>>
>
> Th
Steven Hartland writes:
Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
Comments?
This was discussed in detail in slashdot.. starting with the fact that most
likely debug switches were not turned off for FreeBSD.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
>
> Comments?
>
>
I didn't saw anything related to turning off witness and invariants... so...
Regards,
Francisco
Just noticed the following posted on phoronix:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1
Comments?
Regards
Steve
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or e
22 matches
Mail list logo
