Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Alexander Motin
On 03/12/12 22:45, Ian Lepore wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 21:15 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've found that at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and Sa

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Alexander Motin
On 03/12/12 22:22, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200 Alexander Motinп

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Alexander Motin
On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened simple access to the I

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Alexander Motin
On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've found that at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and

Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've found that at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and SandyBridge Core i7s) with enabled Intel Turbo Boost in BIOS it is not use it by default,

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:38:16 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: > On 03/12/12 22:22, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200 > > Alexander Motin пишет: > > > >> On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >>> В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200 > >>> Alexander Motin пишет: > >>> >

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: > On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200 > > Alexander Motin пишет: > > > >> On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >>> В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200 > >>> Alexander Motin пишет: > I'd l

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:11:28 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: > On 03/12/12 22:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200 > > Alexander Motin пишет: > > > >> On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >>> В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200 > >>> Alexander Motin пишет: > I'd l

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:21 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: > On 03/12/12 21:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200 > > Alexander Motin пишет: > >> I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD > >> opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/co

Re: Improved Intel Turbo Boost status/control

2012-03-12 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0200 Alexander Motin пишет: > Hi. > > I'd like to note that recent r232793 change to cpufreq(4) in HEAD > opened simple access to the Intel Turbo Boost status/control. I've > found that at least two of my desktop systems (based Nehalem and > SandyBridge Core i7s) wi