brooks wrote @ Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:02:50 -0500:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:49:35AM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
> FreeBSD 6 is slower than 4 for some things and faster for others. That
> should be expected since fine grained locking involves increased numbers
> of expensive atomic operations (wh
brooks wrote @ Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:02:50 -0500:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:49:35AM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
> FreeBSD 6 is slower than 4 for some things and faster for others. That
> should be expected since fine grained locking involves increased numbers
> of expensive atomic operations (wh
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:49:35AM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
>
> I've read/seen reports on -questions about this ... especially in an SMP
> environment ...
>
> Is there any truth to this?
>
> One person that posted on -questions pointed out that when he tried to
> point out the difference, he
I've read/seen reports on -questions about this ... especially in an SMP
environment ...
Is there any truth to this?
One person that posted on -questions pointed out that when he tried to
point out the difference, he was told one of:
a. It is either your hardware sucks
b. your benchmark a
