On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
> I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's MFC
> [2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr instead of
> libpthread (via libmap.conf) and build bind with threads option. In the
new
> test I
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:27:24PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
>
> >I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's MFC
> >[2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr instead of
> >libpthread (vi
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's
MFC [2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr
instead of libpthread (via libmap.conf) and build bind with threads
option. In the new test I did this.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's MFC
[2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr instead of
libpthread (via libmap.conf) and build bind with threads option. In the new
test I did thi
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:37:31PM -0300, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's
> MFC [2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr
> instead of libpthread (via libmap.conf) and build bind with threads
>
Hi,
I repeated that performance test done with bind [1] using now Robert's
MFC [2]. Another tweak that I was supposed to do was to use libthr
instead of libpthread (via libmap.conf) and build bind with threads
option. In the new test I did this.
I used the same methodology, same zone file and sa