Re: Memory allocation performance/statistics patches

2005-04-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: I now have updated versions of these patches, which correct some inconsistencies in approach (universal use of curcpu now, for example), remove some debugging code, etc. I've received relatively little performan

Re: Memory allocation performance/statistics patches

2005-04-25 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: I now have updated versions of these patches, which correct some inconsistencies in approach (universal use of curcpu now, for example), remove some debugging code, etc. I've received relatively little performance feedback on them, and would appreciate

Re: Memory allocation performance/statistics patches

2005-04-25 Thread Robert Watson
I now have updated versions of these patches, which correct some inconsistencies in approach (universal use of curcpu now, for example), remove some debugging code, etc. I've received relatively little performance feedback on them, and would appreciate it if I could get some. :-) Especially a

Re: Memory allocation performance/statistics patches

2005-04-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Robert Watson wrote: I'd like to confirm that for the first two patches, for interesting workloads, performance generally improves, and that stability doesn't degrade. For the third partch, I'd like to quantify the cost of the changes for interesting workloads, and likewise