> Thanks for that. So its showing ~ 600k pps throughput. I'd love to
> know whats setting that upper limit - is it iperf? Userspace?
> Interrupt thread/device driver? Other kernel stuff?
When measuring using ipef, it is iperf itself with high probability,
as the netperf tool can achieve much bette
Hi,
as promised and following your suggestions, I've re-run those performance
tests, included TCP and pps information and put the results here:
http://arwen.ics.muni.cz/~hopet/FreeBSD/7.0-netperf/
There's still quite a lot of things to do, however I hope you find
it useful as of now. I send an up
On 12/10/2007, Petr Holub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as promised and following your suggestions, I've re-run those performance
> tests, included TCP and pps information and put the results here:
> http://arwen.ics.muni.cz/~hopet/FreeBSD/7.0-netperf/
>
> There's still quite a lot of things
G'day,
Could you run some iperf tests with varying packet sizes, right down
to the minimum packet size? I'd be interested in packet-per-second
throughput information.
Adrian
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
Dear all,
I've performed inital set of experiments with FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT
(built on Oct 8th) with Myrinet 10GE cards. Kernel is based on
GENERIC with the following options disabled:
#optionsINVARIANTS
#optionsINVARIANT_SUPPORT
#optionsWITNESS
#optionsWITNESS_SKIPS
