Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:59:44AM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>> [...]
If I ignore documentation distfiles (will this affect benchmarks
in any way?), AFAI
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:59:44AM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>> [...]
If I ignore documentation distfiles (will this affect benchmarks in any
way?), AFAICT the only distribution
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:59:44AM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> If I ignore documentation distfiles (will this affect benchmarks in any
> >> way?), AFAICT the only distribution sets I
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>> [...]
If I ignore documentation distfiles (will this affect benchmarks in any
way?), AFAICT the only distribution sets I need are base, proflibs, kernels
and (maybe) lib32. Is there a way to get "make r
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In an effort to run benchmarks on the latest CURRENT on a couple of slave
> machines, I need to build the distribution sets necessary for an NFS install
> as fast as possible (the slaves are installing over PXE), but
Hi!
In an effort to run benchmarks on the latest CURRENT on a couple of
slave machines, I need to build the distribution sets necessary for an
NFS install as fast as possible (the slaves are installing over PXE),
but still ending up with something as close as possible to a normal
default inst
