On 05/15/07 11:30, Kevin Kobb wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Randy Schultz wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Kevin Kobb spaketh thusly:
-}These reports on poor performance using mpt seem to be on SATA
-}drives. Has anybody been seeing this using SAS drives? -}
-}We are testing Dell PE840s with hot swap SAS
Tom Judge wrote:
> Randy Schultz wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Kevin Kobb spaketh thusly:
>>
>> -}These reports on poor performance using mpt seem to be on SATA
>> -}drives. Has anybody been seeing this using SAS drives? -}
>> -}We are testing Dell PE840s with hot swap SAS drives, and seem to
>>
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Tom Judge spaketh thusly:
-}I have attached some blogbench tests from the following configs:
Woo-hoo! Tnx heaps and loads Tom.
-}
-}Perc5i 4 * SAS 15K RPM 146 Gig disks in raid 5.
Hmm. This one was a bit troubling. It was only about twice as fast as the
SATA/RAID 1 I te
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Kevin Kobb spaketh thusly:
-}These reports on poor performance using mpt seem to be on SATA
-}drives. Has anybody been seeing this using SAS drives?
-}
-}We are testing Dell PE840s with hot swap SAS dri
Randy Schultz wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Kevin Kobb spaketh thusly:
-}These reports on poor performance using mpt seem to be on SATA
-}drives. Has anybody been seeing this using SAS drives?
-}
-}We are testing Dell PE840s with hot swap SAS drives, and seem to get decent
-}performance, though I
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Kevin Kobb spaketh thusly:
-}These reports on poor performance using mpt seem to be on SATA
-}drives. Has anybody been seeing this using SAS drives?
-}
-}We are testing Dell PE840s with hot swap SAS drives, and seem to get decent
-}performance, though I haven't run any benchma
