Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?

2013-02-20 Thread Mark Felder
I've been talking to others and it seems that several of us are convinced that BSD is back on the uptake, so I wouldn't be so quick to mark its demise. :-) ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?

2013-02-20 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Oliver I try to use FreeBSD for day-to-day numerical work, as far as possible. I have to complement it with linux cluster systems, largely due to a range of compilers available there. Anyway, keep me posted if you get anywhere with this. Anton ___ free

Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?

2013-02-20 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 02/20/13 10:09, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht: > Oliver > > I try to use FreeBSD for day-to-day numerical > work, as far as possible. I have to complement > it with linux cluster systems, largely due to > a range of compilers available there. > > Anyway, keep me posted if you get anywhere with th

PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?

2013-02-19 Thread O. Hartmann
A while ago - approximately three years from now, i was looking for a GPGPU capable solution for usage on FreeBSD and I stepped into the compilers from PathScale which are supposed to handle OpenACC (like OpenMP #pragma omp, but in this case #pragma openacc instead). Well, there was hope since Pat