Peter Kieser wrote:
Hello,
If anyone is interested in the exact configuration I've used, I'll be
happy to post.
Please do post, I'll need to setup a similar configuration in a few
weeks so it might be useful :)
(Or maybe just post the differences from your initial configuration)
___
Hello,
I fixed the problem. It appears that the kernel was running out of
memory to allocate the network sockets, I took your guys suggestions
(along with the kernel configurations and such), and the problem is now
resolved. I also replaced the physical machine, but am using the same
NICs for
On Thursday 26 May 2005 14:47, Peter Kieser wrote:
> however I'm currently running into issues where one, or both of the
> NICs will stop transmitting traffic. When I go onto the machine,
> and try to ping something I get "No buffer space available"
>
stopping transmitting anything or only your p
Peter Kieser wrote:
Yes, I have -- some fxp and ed cards.
Have you tried without "optimizing"? Most of your optimizations are for
socket and TCP buffers, only servers need that. A router just forwards
packets.
What does netstat -m say and the "CPU Usage:" column in top? Check the
interrupt
On May 26, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Peter Kieser wrote:
I've tried without fast forwarding, I've tried without the TCP
sendspace as well
as reducing it to 65K, I let maxusers auto tune itself and I've
even tried uping
the KVA space.
OK. You didn't mention whether this helped or made no difference
Quoting Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 2:52 pm, Peter Kieser said:
>
> > I've tried without fast forwarding, I've tried without the TCP sendspace
> > as well as reducing it to 65K, I let maxusers auto tune itself and I've
> > even tried uping the KVA space.
> >
> > I'm a
On Thu, May 26, 2005 2:52 pm, Peter Kieser said:
> I've tried without fast forwarding, I've tried without the TCP sendspace
> as well as reducing it to 65K, I let maxusers auto tune itself and I've
> even tried uping the KVA space.
>
> I'm at a loss, what would be the ideal sysctl's/loader.conf fo
Quoting Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On May 26, 2005, at 1:47 PM, Peter Kieser wrote:
> > The nics are if_dc, this is a stock FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
> > installation (no
> > firewall or anything):
> >
> > Here's my /etc/sysctl.conf:
> >
> > net.inet.ip.rtexpire=1800
> > net.inet.ip.rtmine
On May 26, 2005, at 1:47 PM, Peter Kieser wrote:
The nics are if_dc, this is a stock FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
installation (no
firewall or anything):
Here's my /etc/sysctl.conf:
net.inet.ip.rtexpire=1800
net.inet.ip.rtminexpire=1800
kern.maxfiles=32768
kern.maxfilesperproc=32768
kern.ipc.somaxconn
--
Peter Kieser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Benjamin Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Peter Kieser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050526 10:49]:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > I'm not quite sure if this is the right list to address this to, as it's
> partly
> > a performance problem and partly otherwise.
> >
>
* Peter Kieser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050526 10:49]:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm not quite sure if this is the right list to address this to, as it's
> partly
> a performance problem and partly otherwise.
>
> I have a FreeBSD machine acting as a router (doing approx. 15-25Mbit/s of
> traffic (lot's of s
Hello Peter,
in your kernel, try :
options VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE
options DEVICE_POLLING
options HZ=1000
You say that you do not have any firewall,
so why do you use:
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime=10
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets=1024
you may add:
kern.polling.enable=1
kern.polling.user_frac=50
be
Hello guys,
I'm not quite sure if this is the right list to address this to, as it's partly
a performance problem and partly otherwise.
I have a FreeBSD machine acting as a router (doing approx. 15-25Mbit/s of
traffic (lot's of small packets, about 45,000 pps)), however I'm currently
running into
13 matches
Mail list logo
