On 25.01.2012 14:18, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 25, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24/01/2012 17:53, Marcin Markowski wrote:
On 24.01.2012 14:22, Ivan Voras wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcin
Markowskiwrote:
(on 9.0 we can see also kernel thread named {ix0 que} using 1
On Jan 25, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 24/01/2012 17:53, Marcin Markowski wrote:
>> On 24.01.2012 14:22, Ivan Voras wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcin
Markowskiwrote:
>>>
> (on 9.0 we can see also kernel thread named {ix0 que} using 100% CPU),
>>>
> hw
On 24/01/2012 17:53, Marcin Markowski wrote:
On 24.01.2012 14:22, Ivan Voras wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcin
Markowskiwrote:
(on 9.0 we can see also kernel thread named {ix0 que} using 100% CPU),
hw.ixgbe.num_queues=16
If there really are 16 hardware queues, shouldn't the
On 24.01.2012 14:22, Ivan Voras wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcin
Markowskiwrote:
(on 9.0 we can see also kernel thread named {ix0 que} using 100%
CPU),
hw.ixgbe.num_queues=16
If there really are 16 hardware queues, shouldn't there be 16 kernel
threads for queue processing?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcin Markowskiwrote:
(on 9.0 we can see also kernel thread named {ix0 que} using 100% CPU),
hw.ixgbe.num_queues=16
If there really are 16 hardware queues, shouldn't there be 16 kernel
threads for queue processing?
__
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
> On 24.01.2012 00:34, Vlad Galu wrote:
>>
>> --
>> Good, fast and cheap: pick any two.
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we exper
On 24.01.2012 00:34, Vlad Galu wrote:
--
Good, fast and cheap: pick any two.
On Monday, January 23, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
Hello,
We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we experience
performance problems when incoming traffic is greater than
7.5Gbps/s.
If we che
--
Good, fast and cheap: pick any two.
On Monday, January 23, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we experience
> performance problems when incoming traffic is greater than 7.5Gbps/s.
> If we check 'top' we see that first irq
Hi Jack,
Thank You for Your answer.
I forgot to mention that if the program will run for more than 30-40
sec.
server loses connection to the internet. I'm not sure if problem isnt
with MSI-X, because NIC (82575EB - igb driver) used for the internet is
also
using MSI-X. Disabling MSI-X for i
There may be some interrupt handling changes coming, but at least for
the moment you need to increase the storm threshold, or set it to 0 to
disable it.
Jack
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcin Markowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we experience
>
Hello,
We use FreeBSD as sniffer (libpcap programs) and we experience
performance problems when incoming traffic is greater than 7.5Gbps/s.
If we check 'top' we see that first irq from network card is using
100% CPU. I've tested this on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE and 9.0-RELEASE
(on 9.0 we can see also
11 matches
Mail list logo