age-
> From: owner-freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jack Vogel
> Sent: martedì 18 agosto 2009 0.04
> To: Carlos Pardo
> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
>
> W
F Rcvd = 7946320044993*
>
> ix1: XOFF Xmtd = 0
>
> ix1: Total Packets Rcvd = 1002
>
> ix1: Good Packets Rcvd = 1002
>
> ix1: Good Packets Xmtd = 1588
>
> ix1: TSO Transmissions = 0
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> C Pardo
>
>
>
> *From:* Jac
to:
> owner-freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Invernizzi Fabrizio
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 3:13 AM
> To: Jack Vogel; Julian Elischer
> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Stefan Lambrev
> Subject: RE: Test on 10GBE Intel based netwo
-
From: owner-freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Invernizzi Fabrizio
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 3:13 AM
To: Jack Vogel; Julian Elischer
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Stefan Lambrev
Subject: RE: Test on 10GBE Intel based networ
+39 3316001344
Fax +39 06 41867287
From: Jack Vogel [mailto:jfvo...@gmail.com]
Sent: martedì 4 agosto 2009 18.42
To: Julian Elischer
Cc: Invernizzi Fabrizio; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Stefan Lambrev
Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
Y
To: Julian Elischer
Cc: Invernizzi Fabrizio; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Stefan Lambrev
Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
Your nmbclusters is very low, you list it twice so I'm assuming the second
value is
what it ends up being, 32K :(
I would set
Your nmbclusters is very low, you list it twice so I'm assuming the second
value is
what it ends up being, 32K :(
I would set it to:
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=262144
Also, I thought you were using the current driver, but now it looks like you
are
using something fairly old, use my latest code which
Invernizzi Fabrizio wrote:
The limitation that you see is about the max number of packets that
FreeBSD can handle - it looks like your best performance is reached at
64 byte packets?
If you are meaning in term of Packet per second, you are right. These
are the packet per second measured during
09 9.55
> To: Julian Elischer
> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Stefan Lambrev
> Subject: RE: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
>
> > >> The limitation that you see is about the max number of packets that
> > >> FreeBSD can handle - it looks like your
Ray,
>To me it looks like interrupt coalescing is not switched on for some reason.
>Are you passing any parameters to the driver in boot.conf.
This is my loader.conf
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=65635
kern.hz=1000
net.bpf_jitter.enable=1
# net.graph.threads=32
#
> >> The limitation that you see is about the max number of packets that
> >> FreeBSD can handle - it looks like your best performance is reached at
> >> 64 byte packets?
> >
> > If you are meaning in term of Packet per second, you are right. These
> are the packet per second measured during tests:
Hi all,
cpuset is the command to set a cpu affinity,
there are details @ http://bramp.net/blog/post
vmstat -z is the command you need to determine whether there is contention
for mbufs.
although the cpu usage does not suggest the system is memory constrained.
Regards
Ray Kinsella
On Mon, Aug 3
Hi Fabizio,
Ignore my last mail direct to you, 638976 PPS is awful.
(today is a national holiday here, my brain is not switched on).
To me it looks like interrupt coalescing is not switched on for some reason.
Are you passing any parameters to the driver in boot.conf.
Could you retest with vmstat
Invernizzi Fabrizio wrote:
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Lambrev [mailto:stefan.lamb...@moneybookers.com]
Sent: lunedì 3 agosto 2009 11.22
To: Invernizzi Fabrizio
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
Hi,
The limitation that you
If you go to FreeBSD 8 you will get the improved stack code, and the RX/TX
queue pairs
will be pinned to cpus. It should improve performance.
Make sure you have enough mbuf memory allocated, try increasing the
descriptors.
Jack
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Invernizzi Fabrizio <
fabrizio.inve
> > If you are meaning in term of Packet per second, you are right.
> > These are the packet per second measured during tests:
> >
> > 64 byte:610119 Pps
> > 512 byte: 516917 Pps
> > 1492 byte: 464962 Pps
> >
> >
> >> Am I correct that the maximum you can reach is around 639,000
tefan Lambrev [mailto:stefan.lamb...@moneybookers.com]
> > Sent: lunedì 3 agosto 2009 11.22
> > To: Invernizzi Fabrizio
> > Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The limitation that
p.tcbhashsize: 512
> net.inet.tcp.hostcache.hashsize: 512
>
>
> Fabrizio
>
>
> From: István [mailto:lecc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: lunedì 3 agosto 2009 12.02
> To: Invernizzi Fabrizio
> Cc: Stefan Lambrev; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Test
From: István [mailto:lecc...@gmail.com]
Sent: lunedì 3 agosto 2009 12.02
To: Invernizzi Fabrizio
Cc: Stefan Lambrev; freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
what about your sysctls?
I would like to see what have you done yet.
Here
Hi,
On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Invernizzi Fabrizio wrote:
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Lambrev [mailto:stefan.lamb...@moneybookers.com]
Sent: lunedì 3 agosto 2009 11.22
To: Invernizzi Fabrizio
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Lambrev [mailto:stefan.lamb...@moneybookers.com]
> Sent: lunedì 3 agosto 2009 11.22
> To: Invernizzi Fabrizio
> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Test on 10GBE Intel based network card
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
The limitation that you see is about the max number of packets that
FreeBSD can handle - it looks like your best performance is reached at
64 byte packets?
Am I correct that the maximum you can reach is around 639,000 packets
per second?
Also you are not routing the traffic, but instead
22 matches
Mail list logo
