Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-02-18 Thread Florian Smeets
On 29.01.12 10:50, O. Hartmann wrote: > > We got a new workstation, two socket 6-core westmere XEON's, I forgot > the specifications, but they're driven with 2,66 GHz each and have > access to 96GB RAM. Maybe I can also setup some benchmarks, but I need > advice since I'm not a kernel GURU. > The

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-30 Thread Ivan Voras
On 28/01/2012 23:40, Florian Smeets wrote: The conclusion right now seems to be that ULE is faster for database workload, I've done the same benchmarks with Bullet Cache last year and 4BSD is *ridiculously* inefficient and slow for this specific workload which involves a lot of inter-thread

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-29 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 01/28/12 23:40, schrieb Florian Smeets: > [current@ bcc'ed to get a wider audience, please discuss on performance@] > > Hi, > > in recent times i saw a lot of threads where it was suggested people > should switch from the ULE to the 4BSD scheduler. That got me thinking > and i decided to run a

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Florian Smeets wrote: > [current@ bcc'ed to get a wider audience, please discuss on performance@] > > Hi, > > in recent times i saw a lot of threads where it was suggested people > should switch from the ULE to the 4BSD scheduler. That got me thinking > and i deci

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Mark Linimon
Thank you for doing this work. mcl ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Florian Smeets
On 29.01.12 01:56, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/28/2012 14:40, Florian Smeets wrote: >> The results are available in this Google docs spreadsheet, if you >> scroll down there are also some nice graphs. > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai0N1xDe3uNAdDRxcVFiYjNMSnJWOTZhUWVWWlBlemc > >

Re: ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/28/2012 14:40, Florian Smeets wrote: > The results are available in this Google docs spreadsheet, if you > scroll down there are also some nice graphs. > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai0N1xDe3uNAdDRxcVFiYjNMSnJWOTZhUWVWWlBlem

ULE vs. 4BSD scheduler benchmarks

2012-01-28 Thread Florian Smeets
[current@ bcc'ed to get a wider audience, please discuss on performance@] Hi, in recent times i saw a lot of threads where it was suggested people should switch from the ULE to the 4BSD scheduler. That got me thinking and i decided to run a few benchmarks. I looked through all the stuff Kris and