At 10:04 AM 04/05/2005, Steven Hartland wrote:
Did you also try the sys/param.h change that helped here.
I have not yet but will soon. The tweaking certainly does make a difference
in various numbers. I ran some extensive iozone tests overnight too see
how those numbers are effected by these twe
Did you also try the sys/param.h change that helped here.
Also when testing on FS I found bs=1024k to degrade performance
try with 64k.
Is this a raid volume? If so on my setup anything other that a 16k stripe
and performance went out the window.
For the 'time' its easier to understand if u use:
/u
At 05:31 PM 02/05/2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Tancsa writes:
>Using an amrc controller in RAID5, it doesnt make a difference really on
>the dd stuff - read or write-- perhaps 2-5MB difference on the faster
>side. Raw reads and writes whether I use da0 or da0
