On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> I mean that surely db will be corrupted and nothing could be recovered. I
> know postgresql and there you have a begin snapshot - end snapshot for this
> topic, data changes are stored in temporal archives and main db files are
> consistent
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 17/11/2011 19:04, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> Question 3:
>>> Anyone Recommend for MySQL server? (Performance)
>>
>> No idea; I haven't run any SQL servers on ZFS
>
> The sort of randomly located small IOs that RDBMSes do is the hardest
> sort
No problem for the most of the MySQL DBAs because consistency is not in
their dictionary anyway :)
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> At 19:26 17/11/2011, you wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone I just had a few questions about ZFS.
>>
>> Question 3:
>>
>> Anyone Recommend for MyS
At 11:33 18/11/2011, István wrote:
No problem for the most of the MySQL DBAs
because consistency is not in their dictionary anyway :)
I mean that surely db will be corrupted and
nothing could be recovered. I know postgresql and
there you have a begin snapshot - end snapshot
for this topic,
At 19:26 17/11/2011, you wrote:
Hello everyone I just had a few questions about ZFS.
Question 3:
Anyone Recommend for MySQL server? (Performance)
A short comment about databases. With ZFS and similar file systems,
when you make a snapshot the file system is recoverable/congruent/ok,
but the
On 17/11/2011 19:04, Mark Felder wrote:
>> Question 3:
>> Anyone Recommend for MySQL server? (Performance)
>
> No idea; I haven't run any SQL servers on ZFS
The sort of randomly located small IOs that RDBMSes do is the hardest
sort of IO pattern for ZFS (or any filesystem for that matter) to
mana
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:58:32 -0600, Freddie Cash
> wrote:
>
> Question 2:
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 9.0 installable on ZFS root?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>
>
> This is now an option in the installer? It wasn't last time I checked,
> but that was a while ago an
Wow. Great reply.
Going to do some practice with mirror type and 9 RC 2.
Thanks again
On Thursday, November 17, 2011, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 AM, list, mailing wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone I just had a few questions about ZFS.
>> I normally use Hardware RAID 5.
>>
>>
Thanks for all the help.
On Thursday, November 17, 2011, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:58:32 -0600, Freddie Cash
wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Question 2:
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 9.0 installable on ZFS root?
>>>
>> Yes.
>
>
> This is now an option in the installer? It wasn't last time I checked,
but th
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:58:32 -0600, Freddie Cash wrote:
Question 2:
FreeBSD 9.0 installable on ZFS root?
Yes.
This is now an option in the installer? It wasn't last time I checked, but
that was a while ago and last I heard it wasn't going to make it in...
I'll have to fire up the la
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 AM, list, mailing wrote:
> Hello everyone I just had a few questions about ZFS.
> I normally use Hardware RAID 5.
>
> Question 1:
>
> With the ZFS snapshots what is the lost in drive space?
>
>
If no data changes after you create the snapshots, then no disk space is
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:26:49 -0600, list, mailing wrote:
Question 1:
With the ZFS snapshots what is the lost in drive space?
ZFS tracks the blocks that change. If you change 60GB of data, you'll lose
60GB of space. (roughly... there is probably some slight overhead but you
get the point)
Hello everyone I just had a few questions about ZFS.
I normally use Hardware RAID 5.
Question 1:
With the ZFS snapshots what is the lost in drive space?
Hard drives I have:
4 x 500 GB = 1.5T on RAID 5
I have see lots of videos like: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN6iDzesEs0
Question 2:
FreeB
13 matches
Mail list logo
