On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:45:47PM -0300, NOC Meganet wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2007 11:30:24 Arne W?rner wrote:
> > --- NOC Prowip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Why d?nt u use glabel?
> > >
> > > hmm, I never considered it
> > > but I guess it does not solve my problem because let's say da0
On Friday 01 June 2007 11:30:24 Arne Wörner wrote:
> --- NOC Prowip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why dönt u use glabel?
> >
> > hmm, I never considered it
> > but I guess it does not solve my problem because let's say da0 is the
> > provider and da0 might have still the label I gave it but t
--- NOC Prowip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why dönt u use glabel?
> >
> hmm, I never considered it
> but I guess it does not solve my problem because let's say da0 is the
> provider and da0 might have still the label I gave it but the OS can not see
> it since it is then aacd0 after changing
On Friday 01 June 2007 10:14:23 Arne Wörner wrote:
> --- NOC Meganet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it is not the best way having different hard disk device names. I
> > think it should be generally hd or something independent of type, driver
> > or controller.
>
> Why dönt u use glabel
--- NOC Meganet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is not the best way having different hard disk device names. I
> think it should be generally hd or something independent of type, driver or
> controller.
>
Why dönt u use glabel?
-Arne
___
Hi all
I am not sure if this is exactly the right list but perhaps some could point
me to it.
I think it is not the best way having different hard disk device names. I
think it should be generally hd or something independent of type, driver or
controller.
Once I had trouble because I needed t
