Chris Brennan wrote:
> Anything gonna be done with this? It has promise but needs some more people
> involved.
The original web page which started this thread was removed from the
FreeBSD.org web site:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2011-September/345334.html
For anyone who wants to
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
This is interesting, and could be mentioned in updated page
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_games_bsd&num=1
>
> --
> Aldis Berjoza
> http://www.bsdroot.lv/
>
Anything gonna be done with this? It has promise but need
This is interesting, and could be mentioned in updated page
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_games_bsd&num=1
--
Aldis Berjoza
http://www.bsdroot.lv/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
http://dtrace.what-creek.com no longer exists, because sadly, the
author of that web page (John Birrell) is no longer with us:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2009-November/001284.html
There are some other documentation pages available for DTrace on FreeBSD:
http://wiki.
I heard of that news, but I didn't realize that web site was managed by John
Birrell.
Now, DTrace is not feature-complete and stable, I don't think it is suitable
to http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/dtrace.html, but to
http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace, and people can easily update it
2011/8/31 C
30.08.2011 12:23, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
[Taking random email.]
I think we could merge the $subj web page with this one (which is
more actual, as of 7.0): http://www.freebsd.org/features.html
The pages serve different purposes. There's no point in elaborating
about feature X if feature X su
I can help, I just changed my job and get more spare time. Currently I can
help write doc and test. There is much documentation about DTrace ( thanks
Sun), but none of these describes the technical details of FreeBSD DTrace
implementation, so I think we can start with this.
1 write doc about what
> I would be happy if such a page would see an update in shorter terms
> like 11 years ...
Fixing some ancient PRs would be nice also. (fixed, not just closed)
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
on 30/08/2011 18:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> 4. There is a missing developer/maintainer for DTrace on FreeBSD.
I probably should clarify this point: it doesn't have to be *the* maintainer, a
collective maintainer is also perfect. Thus, contributions are very welcome.
> Nevertheless the
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:45:09PM +0800, Paul Ambrose wrote:
> 3 There is a missing feature list about DTrace, but no schedule list about
> when to fix it.
We just need someone who wants to spend a lot of time working on it.
Without that, there is no point in putting up a schedule.
mcl
on 30/08/2011 16:45 Paul Ambrose said the following:
> I do not believe the current status of DTrace is appropriate for promoting
>
> 1. DTrace is an experimental function or Semi-finished products. The kernel
> dtrace support is ok, but the userland support is far from completion(at
> least the
be brushed up or taken offline!
It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
I think this one would better look like list of major features with os
comparison, like:
= Networking =
* IPv6: major support, best stack around.
* SCTP: full
;> This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
> >>>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
> >>>
> >>> I think this one would better look like li
On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
> > It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
On 08/30/11 11:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 08/29/2011 10:58 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison
with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD
over other systems.
I dont think a monthly update i
rushed up or taken offline!
>>>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
>>>
>>> I think this one would better look like list of major features with os
>>> compariso
On 08/30/11 09:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os
On 29/08/2011 20:58, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
= SMP =
* (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some
rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like
DragonflyBSD and QNX).
From a recent post to -questions:
"Alas, during a recent kernel build, I us
27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
I think this one would better look like list of major features with os
comparison, like
;> This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
>> >> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
>> >
>> > Agreed. Things have changed quite a bit in the last decade.
&
nn, O.
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
>>>>>>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.freebsd.or
, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O.
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
>>> >> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-compari
This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
>> >> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
>> >
>> > Agreed. Things have changed quite a bit in the last decade.
>>
>
of vintage stuff from glory days.
> >>
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
> >
> > Agreed. Things have changed quite a bit in the last decade.
>
> It reads rather FUD-like too.
It's a pitty that the comments until now are only general
On 27 August 2011 20:32, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O.
> wrote:
>> This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-compariso
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
> This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
Agreed. Things have changed quite a bit in the last deca
This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
O.
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
27 matches
Mail list logo
