At 10:02 AM 12/24/2008, ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Comparing to your original numbers, it looks like you might have some
debugging enabled there: the original 7.x results went from 13:57 to
Yes, its a regular kernel and things like malloc are the default and
from the dmesg
WARNING: WITNESS o
On 24/12/2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 11:20 AM 12/23/2008, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>>I just thought of another thing - can you boot an 8-CURRENT kernel
>>on the machine and report the value of kern.sched.topology_spec
>>sysctl? This is to verify how the ULE sees the HTT topology of the CPUs.
>
>
> An
At 11:20 AM 12/23/2008, Ivan Voras wrote:
I just thought of another thing - can you boot an 8-CURRENT kernel
on the machine and report the value of kern.sched.topology_spec
sysctl? This is to verify how the ULE sees the HTT topology of the CPUs.
And buildworld from current
4,8 and 10
3287.
At 11:20 AM 12/23/2008, Ivan Voras wrote:
I just thought of another thing - can you boot an 8-CURRENT kernel
on the machine and report the value of kern.sched.topology_spec
sysctl? This is to verify how the ULE sees the HTT topology of the CPUs.
It will have to wait for the next board as this
Mike Tancsa wrote:
FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Dec 19 19:48:15 EST 2008
mdtan...@ns3c.recycle.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/recycle
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (2666.78-MHz
686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" I
At 05:22 AM 12/23/2008, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > Just got our first board to play around with and unlike in the past,
> > having hyperthreading enabled seems to help performance At least in
> > buildworld tests.
> >
> > doi
On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > Just got our first board to play around with and unlike in the past,
> > having hyperthreading enabled seems to help performance At least in
> > buildworld tests.
> >
> > doing a make -j4 vs -j6 make -j8 vs -j10 gives
> >
>
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Just got our first board to play around with and unlike in the past,
> having hyperthreading enabled seems to help performance At least in
> buildworld tests.
>
> doing a make -j4 vs -j6 make -j8 vs -j10 gives
>
> -j buildworld time% improvement over -j4
> 4 13
Just got our first board to play around with and unlike in the past,
having hyperthreading enabled seems to help performance At least
in buildworld tests.
doing a make -j4 vs -j6 make -j8 vs -j10 gives
-j buildworld time% improvement over -j4
4 13:57
6 12:1113%
