Michael Vince wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
No real difference here too...
I started a thread on that subject not long ago and following Robert's
tip setting net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 yielded better results.
--
Joao Barros
___
With the new TCP/IP
Michael Vince wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still av
Joao Barros wrote:
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still average at 10MB/s (a
Joao Barros wrote:
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still average at 10MB/s (al
On 1/26/06, Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rich Murphey wrote:
> > I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
> > effect on samba3 performance as well.
>
> No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
> transfers still average at 10MB/s (although it did peak at 2
Rich Murphey wrote:
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
No real difference here, tried ACPI-fast, i8254, and TSC. :( My
transfers still average at 10MB/s (although it did peak at 20MB/s once)
Which is really horrible for a em gigabit link wit
I'm curious whether Robert's patch might have an
effect on samba3 performance as well.
This isn't very methodical, but I see about
60% increase samba3 read bandwidth (from 14MB/s to
26Mb/s) when changing from the default
kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 to TSC, which
makes me wonder whether it mig
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Ivan Voras wrote:
Thomas Krause (Webmatic) wrote:
But with static linked libraries, I cannot switch between
libthread and libthr - right? Could somebody give me an inspiration/
recommendation?
Unless you are ready to count individual CPU cycles, you won't find a
notica
Thomas Krause (Webmatic) wrote:
But with static linked libraries, I cannot switch between
libthread and libthr - right? Could somebody give me an inspiration/
recommendation?
Unless you are ready to count individual CPU cycles, you won't find a
noticable difference between static and dynamic
Hi,
I've read a lot about mysql performance tuning - also
on this list.
1) I can switch from libpthread to libthr, which should
give a perfomance benefit. This is done in /etc/libmap.conf
2) I can build a static linked version of mysqld (BUILD_OPTIMIZED=yes),
which should also give a per
10 matches
Mail list logo
