I wanted to run an FTP server on a machine protected by PF on FreeBSD
6.1 p10. I use pftpx for normal client proxying (as the PF's ftp-proxy
in FreeBSD is outdated and does not work for my FTP clients (Windows XP
with firewall enabled does not allow the connections to originate from
different IP ad
Sorry the typo.
"The reply-to is not working when it is used with synproxy"
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:49:35PM -0200, Aristeu Gil Alves Jr wrote:
> he reply-to is not working when it is used with synproxy.
Yes, that's a known problem. Packets generated by pf itself (synproxy,
return-rst, etc.) don't honour route-to or reply-to options.
It's on some to-do list, but hasn'
The reply-to is not working when it is used with synproxy.
The scenario is described bellow:
gw-isp1 e gw-isp2 are the IP from ISP 1 and 2 gateways:
/etc/pf.conf
if_isp1="ed0"
if_isp2="ed1"
if_internal="ed2"
route1="( ed0 gw-isp1 )"
route2="( ed1 gw-isp2 )"
he reply-to is not working when it is used with synproxy.
The scenario is described bellow:
gw-isp1 e gw-isp2 are the IP from ISP 1 and 2 gateways:
/etc/pf.conf
if_isp1="ed0"
if_isp2="ed1"
if_internal="ed2"
route1="( ed0 gw-isp1 )"
route2="( ed1 gw-isp2 )"
r
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
o kern/82271 pf [pf] cbq scheduler cause bad latency
f kern/86072 pf [pf] Packet Filter rule
